Amillennialist

Archive for the ‘Geert Wilders’ Category

Multiculturalism and craven self-censorship as the path to the Islamization of the West

In Appeasers and Useful Idiot Dhimmis, Geert Wilders, Pat Condell, The truth about Islam, Western Civilization subverted from within on April 9, 2010 at 9:14 AM

For centuries, Islam has been impotent, unable to use its preferred method of “persuasion” against the West (slaughter) — its last best chance having been obliterated on the first September 11th at the gates of Vienna in 1683 (thank you, Jan III Sobieski) — so it’s found another way: Aided both by trillions in blood for oil for the funding of indoctrination and propaganda centers within our own borders and the West’s suicidal self-loathing in the guise of Multiculturalism, Europe — and soon America, bankrupted and disarmed by the allegedly-former-Muslim in the White House — is at the precipice of a new Dark Ages.  A new Inquisition has begun, this time in defense of Islam rather than in defense against it.

Pat Condell condemns the cowardice of establishment Europe in persecuting (prosecuting) Geert Wilders for telling the truth about Islam (thanks to Dan for posting this; be sure to visit his excellent site).

Western Civilization hangs by a thread:

Advertisements

Dismissing existential threats to Western Civilization: It’s the only thing many of today’s Europeans do better than Jew-hatred

In Appeasers and Useful Idiot Dhimmis, Battle of Tours/Poitiers, Charles Martel, Geert Wilders, Ignorant and gullible Infidels, Jihad, The truth about Islam on February 1, 2010 at 11:11 PM

Geert Wilders is today’s Winston Churchill in a world full of Neville Chamberlains and Grima Wormtongues, clueless cowards and treasonous snakes typified by people like Rory Graycrow Underclass, who asks in response to the heroic Wilders’ warnings to the West regarding its Islamic Enemy Within:

In 1400 years Islam has failed to take over Europe. Why is he so afraid it will happen now?

Such a question betrays a suicidal ignorance of nearly one and one-half millennia of jihad in Europe.

After Muhammad’s death, his armies exploded out of Arabia and into the Holy Land, North Africa, Persia, Greater India, etc., nation after nation throughout Africa and Asia falling to Allah’s butchers.  Formerly Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu, Zoroastrian, animist, and other non-Muslim societies were obliterated, consumed, mutilated, and subsumed by the Religion of Insatiable Bloodlust.

Neither was Europe spared.  The fact is, Islamic tyranny in Europe goes back to its beginnings.  In the west, Spain fought for eight hundred years to regain its freedom from its Islamic overlords, succeeding finally in 1492.  If not for Charles Martel (“The Hammer”), who stopped Islam’s advance into France and the heart of Europe at the Battle of Tours/Poitiers in 732, western Europe would have fallen to Allah.  (And that would have meant no Michelangelo, no Beethoven, no Isaac Newton, no Albert Einstein, no Christopher Columbus, no George Washington, no Magna Carta, no Mayflower Compact, no Declaration of Independence, no Bill of Rights.)

The coastal areas of the British Isles and the Mediterranean also suffered jihad’s depredations, both directly and by proxy.  Part of the Vikings’ notorious malevolence was due to their contribution to the Islamic slave trade.  Italy, Sicily, Greece, and other coastal European regions suffered at the hands of Muslims themselves.

Eastern Europe fared no better than the rest.  Turkey is the epitome of why Geert Wilders is concerned about Islam.  Before it was forcibly secularized by Kemal Ataturk, Turkey was the Ottoman Empire; before that it was part of Byzantium, the great Christian empire.  After centuries of jihad, the Byzantine Empire was overthrown finally in 1453 when its great city Constantinople — the “Rome of the East” — and its magnificent church Hagia Sofia — the jewel of Christendom — fell to jihad.

And that doesn’t include centuries of jihad in the Balkans.  Christian boys were kidnapped by Muhammad’s monsters, forcibly converted, twisted into devils, and sent back to enslave and slaughter their own people.  Forget neither the Siege of Vienna in 1683, where Jan Sobieski repelled the last flagrant attempt by the ummah to conquer Europe.

What does any of that have to do with today?  Only this: Islam has not changed, its adherents are rediscovering what their god and prophet require of them, and rather than champions like Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski crushing jihad and halting the Islamization of their homelands, people like Rory Graycrow Underclass import the Religion of Pedophilia, Female Genital Mutilation, and Wife-beating.  They implement shari’a courts.  They obfuscate for, and punish criticism of, the barbaric ideology.

Why is Geert Wilders “so afraid it will happen now”?

Because it is happening now.

Next presidential election, vote for the American

In Barack Hussein Obama, Election 2012, Geert Wilders, John Bolton, President Bush establishing Islam, Shari'a, Socialism on February 26, 2009 at 3:08 PM

. . . or someone who has America’s best interests at heart.

A few days ago, I wrote that the fate of our nation could be either Socialism or shari’a. Looking at what President Hussein and his minions in the Congress have been doing, it looks like Obama is not making just the suicidally-stupid policy decisions and appointments that all Liberals make. He seems to be going out of his way to bankrupt and disarm the country (and whom does that benefit?).

Trillions of dollars of debt, socialized medicine, cabinet members who believe it is politicians’ responsibility to raise your children, tyrants who think arrogantly and foolishly that it is their right to decide when and if free men can exercise their Right to Bear Arms, billions to terrorists and their supporters (what’s the difference?), reducing our nuclear armament and military, releasing his co-religionists from terrorist prisons, closing those prisons, and putting into important positions in his administration Islam-abetting Jew-haters.

I wrote once of President Bush that his advancing Islam in so many ways almost seems intentional, but Barry Soetoro has it in for Uncle Sam.

If we can have an illegal immigrant possessing British (Kenyan) and Indonesian citizenship as Commander-in-Chief, then why can’t we have a Geert Wilders/John Bolton/Allan West presidency?

Next presidential election, vote for the American

In Barack Hussein Obama, Election 2012, Geert Wilders, John Bolton, President Bush establishing Islam, Shari'a, Socialism on February 26, 2009 at 3:08 PM

. . . or someone who has America’s best interests at heart.

A few days ago, I wrote that the fate of our nation could be either Socialism or shari’a. Looking at what President Hussein and his minions in the Congress have been doing, it looks like Obama is not making just the suicidally-stupid policy decisions and appointments that all Liberals make. He seems to be going out of his way to bankrupt and disarm the country (and whom does that benefit?).

Trillions of dollars of debt, socialized medicine, cabinet members who believe it is politicians’ responsibility to raise your children, tyrants who think arrogantly and foolishly that it is their right to decide when and if free men can exercise their Right to Bear Arms, billions to terrorists and their supporters (what’s the difference?), reducing our nuclear armament and military, releasing his co-religionists from terrorist prisons, closing those prisons, and putting into important positions in his administration Islam-abetting Jew-haters.

I wrote once of President Bush that his advancing Islam in so many ways almost seems intentional, but Barry Soetoro has it in for Uncle Sam.

If we can have an illegal immigrant possessing British (Kenyan) and Indonesian citizenship as Commander-in-Chief, then why can’t we have a Geert Wilders/John Bolton/Allan West presidency?

Muslims who feign moderation in order to demonize critics of Islam are a threat to the West . . .

In Ali Eteraz, Appeasers and Useful Idiot Dhimmis, Deceiving non-Muslims, Fitna, Geert Wilders, Ignorant and gullible Infidels, Qur'an 9:5 The Verse of the Sword, The truth about Islam on April 20, 2008 at 12:46 AM

. . . not a courageous politician seeking to inform — and thereby save — his fellow citizens from an ancient and revitalized existential threat.

Ali Eteraz equates Geert Wilders — a man documenting Islamic men preaching Islamic words and carrying out Islamic carnage — with those very same malevolent monsters.

Disgusting.

And when Eteraz mentions the Dutch Parliament to legitimize his desire to censor Wilders, either he doesn’t realize that that august body is teeming with cowards and appeasers who make Chamberlain look like Churchill (unlikely), or he hopes that his readers are too ignorant or lazy to do anything other than swallow what he’s implying: If Wilders own government opposes him, he must be bad (and you are too, if you don’t join the program).

Such an argument tells you all you need to know about on whose side Ali Eteraz and his ilk are in this civilizational struggle.

In response to more logical fallacies and half truths in defense of Allah from a promising practitioner of Islamic Newspeak:

Ali Eteraz still deceiving and hoping no one will notice, I see.

The author has conceded previously that Qur’anic verses requiring offensive violence against non-Muslims exist, but rather than address that fact in this forum and offer his “remedy” (his empty assertion that those commands were only for Mohammed; how can a mandate addressed to Muslims be only for Mohammed?), he employs an embarrassingly transparent ad hominem attack against Wilders.

Even if one or two of the passages in Fitna do not specifically apply to the carnage carried out in Allah’s name with which they were connected (for example, burning is Allah’s punishment, not for Muslims to use), the truth is that Wilders could have used so many others, for Qur’an and Sunnah demand slavery or death for all who refuse the “invitation” to Islam.

But again, just as in his misleading and stupidly disingenuous “refutation” of OBL’s alleged misapplication of The Verse of the Sword,” Ali Eteraz hopes that his charges of “Islamo-xeno-arabo-phobia!” and other red herrings will prevent non-Muslims from noticing that his god and prophet require the conversion, subjugation and humiliation, and death of all non-Muslims “until all religion is for Allah.”

If only Muslims venerated Charlie and the Chocolate Factory rather than the word of Allah and the example of Mohammed. I’d trade “Oompa-Loompas” for “Allahu Akbars!” any time.

Here is what Ali Eteraz hopes to obfuscate:

Some of the Source and Sustenance of 1350 years of Allah’s War Against Humanity:

“the Messenger of Allah . . . would say: ‘Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war. . . . When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. . . . Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. . . . If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them . . .'” (Muslim Book 19, Number 4294).

“fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war) . . . ” (Qur’an 9:5).

“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).

“Allah’s Apostle said: ‘I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle . . . ‘” (Bukhari Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24).

“Say to the Unbelievers, if (now) they desist (from Unbelief), their past would be forgiven them; but if they persist, the punishment of those before them is already (a matter of warning for them). And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone (in the whole of the world). But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do” (Qur’an 8:38; ayah 39 from Noble Qur’an).

[. . .]

There is much more to be found on th[is topic] (and others) from Islam’s own “sacred” texts.

And in response to a comment by one of Eteraz’s coreligionists:

04/20/08 4:40 am

I see Ali has brought along at least one of his hatchet men.

Let’s look at Buzz Kill’s “arguments,” shall we?

Intelligent open free societies must constantly struggle to find the
right tension between absolute free speech and limited free speech.
Anyone that thinks American or European socities are built on the
bedrock of the first amendment or absolute free speech, which must be
doggedly protected, have never apparently heard of a libel suit, Bong
Hits 4 Jesus ( Morse v. Frederick ) or yelling “Fire!” in a crowded theater.”

Equating the reporting of the preaching and practice of religious texts with 1) lying and 2) a threat to public safety is accurate only when those texts are Islamic. But that’s not what he meant, is it?

The blame lies not with the person reporting those facts, but with those commands and those who preach, defend, and seek to fulfill them today.

There are limits to free speech. Not every piece of grandstanding hate
speech deserves a soapbox in town hall. Sometimes, people must use the
judgement and exercise their free will to not allow hate into their
cities and towns.

Wilders opposes hate in his cities and towns, which is why he is exposing the word of Allah and the example of Mohammed.

In accord with Mohammed’s example, Buzz Kill seeks to silence criticism of the pedophile prophet.

To demonize those exposing malice is perverse. He should be ashamed.

This has become particularly difficult with the internet and
something of a puzzle to solve.

Free speech is a problem only for tyrants and those with something to hide.

in this incident, at a time when anti-Muslim emotions have not been whipped up to the point of genocide, we can sit quietly and debate what we would and should do in times when political or religious hatred has become dangerously manipulated.

That’s the pot calling the china “black.” Nice try at “manipulating” the discourse.

Wilders exposes the genocidal impulse foundational to Islam, but Buzz Kill accuses those who would defend themselves against that impulse of harboring one!

Typical Muslim apologist: Blame the victim!

Apparently, Buzz Kill’s shame knows no bounds.

Wilders is a Hitler with bad timing.

Ridiculous ad hominem.

I have an idea: Rather than libel someone exposing and denouncing the threat to humanity posed by the command of Allah and the example of Mohammed, why don’t Ali Eteraz and Buzz Kill join him?

Some free speech doesn’t promote freedom.

Not when it obfuscates for evil, as AE’s column and BK’s post do.

Muslims who feign moderation in order to demonize critics of Islam are a threat to the West . . .

In Ali Eteraz, Appeasers and Useful Idiot Dhimmis, Deceiving non-Muslims, Fitna, Geert Wilders, Ignorant and gullible Infidels, Qur'an 9:5 The Verse of the Sword, The truth about Islam on April 20, 2008 at 12:46 AM

. . . not a courageous politician seeking to inform — and thereby save — his fellow citizens from an ancient and revitalized existential threat.

Ali Eteraz equates Geert Wilders — a man documenting Islamic men preaching Islamic words and carrying out Islamic carnage — with those very same malevolent monsters.

Disgusting.

And when Eteraz mentions the Dutch Parliament to legitimize his desire to censor Wilders, either he doesn’t realize that that august body is teeming with cowards and appeasers who make Chamberlain look like Churchill (unlikely), or he hopes that his readers are too ignorant or lazy to do anything other than swallow what he’s implying: If Wilders own government opposes him, he must be bad (and you are too, if you don’t join the program).

Such an argument tells you all you need to know about on whose side Ali Eteraz and his ilk are in this civilizational struggle.

In response to more logical fallacies and half truths in defense of Allah from a promising practitioner of Islamic Newspeak:

Ali Eteraz still deceiving and hoping no one will notice, I see.

The author has conceded previously that Qur’anic verses requiring offensive violence against non-Muslims exist, but rather than address that fact in this forum and offer his “remedy” (his empty assertion that those commands were only for Mohammed; how can a mandate addressed to Muslims be only for Mohammed?), he employs an embarrassingly transparent ad hominem attack against Wilders.

Even if one or two of the passages in Fitna do not specifically apply to the carnage carried out in Allah’s name with which they were connected (for example, burning is Allah’s punishment, not for Muslims to use), the truth is that Wilders could have used so many others, for Qur’an and Sunnah demand slavery or death for all who refuse the “invitation” to Islam.

But again, just as in his misleading and stupidly disingenuous “refutation” of OBL’s alleged misapplication of The Verse of the Sword,” Ali Eteraz hopes that his charges of “Islamo-xeno-arabo-phobia!” and other red herrings will prevent non-Muslims from noticing that his god and prophet require the conversion, subjugation and humiliation, and death of all non-Muslims “until all religion is for Allah.”

If only Muslims venerated Charlie and the Chocolate Factory rather than the word of Allah and the example of Mohammed. I’d trade “Oompa-Loompas” for “Allahu Akbars!” any time.

Here is what Ali Eteraz hopes to obfuscate:

Some of the Source and Sustenance of 1350 years of Allah’s War Against Humanity:

“the Messenger of Allah . . . would say: ‘Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war. . . . When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. . . . Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. . . . If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them . . .'” (Muslim Book 19, Number 4294).

“fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war) . . . ” (Qur’an 9:5).

“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).

“Allah’s Apostle said: ‘I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle . . . ‘” (Bukhari Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24).

“Say to the Unbelievers, if (now) they desist (from Unbelief), their past would be forgiven them; but if they persist, the punishment of those before them is already (a matter of warning for them). And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone (in the whole of the world). But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do” (Qur’an 8:38; ayah 39 from Noble Qur’an).

[. . .]

There is much more to be found on th[is topic] (and others) from Islam’s own “sacred” texts.

And in response to a comment by one of Eteraz’s coreligionists:

04/20/08 4:40 am

I see Ali has brought along at least one of his hatchet men.

Let’s look at Buzz Kill’s “arguments,” shall we?

Intelligent open free societies must constantly struggle to find the
right tension between absolute free speech and limited free speech.
Anyone that thinks American or European socities are built on the
bedrock of the first amendment or absolute free speech, which must be
doggedly protected, have never apparently heard of a libel suit, Bong
Hits 4 Jesus ( Morse v. Frederick ) or yelling “Fire!” in a crowded theater.”

Equating the reporting of the preaching and practice of religious texts with 1) lying and 2) a threat to public safety is accurate only when those texts are Islamic. But that’s not what he meant, is it?

The blame lies not with the person reporting those facts, but with those commands and those who preach, defend, and seek to fulfill them today.

There are limits to free speech. Not every piece of grandstanding hate
speech deserves a soapbox in town hall. Sometimes, people must use the
judgement and exercise their free will to not allow hate into their
cities and towns.

Wilders opposes hate in his cities and towns, which is why he is exposing the word of Allah and the example of Mohammed.

In accord with Mohammed’s example, Buzz Kill seeks to silence criticism of the pedophile prophet.

To demonize those exposing malice is perverse. He should be ashamed.

This has become particularly difficult with the internet and
something of a puzzle to solve.

Free speech is a problem only for tyrants and those with something to hide.

in this incident, at a time when anti-Muslim emotions have not been whipped up to the point of genocide, we can sit quietly and debate what we would and should do in times when political or religious hatred has become dangerously manipulated.

That’s the pot calling the china “black.” Nice try at “manipulating” the discourse.

Wilders exposes the genocidal impulse foundational to Islam, but Buzz Kill accuses those who would defend themselves against that impulse of harboring one!

Typical Muslim apologist: Blame the victim!

Apparently, Buzz Kill’s shame knows no bounds.

Wilders is a Hitler with bad timing.

Ridiculous ad hominem.

I have an idea: Rather than libel someone exposing and denouncing the threat to humanity posed by the command of Allah and the example of Mohammed, why don’t Ali Eteraz and Buzz Kill join him?

Some free speech doesn’t promote freedom.

Not when it obfuscates for evil, as AE’s column and BK’s post do.

Fitna

In Fitna, Geert Wilders, The truth about Islam on March 29, 2008 at 11:59 AM

Let no one use ignorance as an excuse any longer.

The truth will out
.

The West’s so-called leaders are self-seeking, ignorant cowards in service to Allah

In Appeasers and Useful Idiot Dhimmis, Defending jihad, FBI sensitive to Islam, Geert Wilders, Hamas, Liberals aid jihad, President Bush establishing Islam, The truth about Islam, Wafa Sultan on March 7, 2008 at 11:03 PM

President Bush pressures Israel to show “restraint” in punishing those responsible for killing their innocents.

Our media remain silent as the Religionists of Peace use their own children as shields against Israeli self-defense.

European politicians and media line up against Geert Wilders’s exposing the truth about Islam.

Our FBI extends the brainwashing of its agents for Allah.

The West’s so-called leaders are self-seeking, ignorant cowards. Doing what our political, media, and academic elites should be doing, here is Wafa Sultan on Al-Jazeera telling the truth about Islam:

“All religions and faiths, throughout the history of humanity, have been subject to criticism and affronts. With time, this has helped in their reform and development. Any belief that chops off the heads of its critics is doomed to turn into terrorism and tyranny. This has been the condition of Islam, from its inception to this day. Islam has sentenced [its critics] to prison, and whoever crosses the threshold of that prison meets his death. The Danish cartoons have managed to break down the first brick in the wall of that prison, and to open up a window, through which the sunrays enter, after a lengthy darkness. The Danish newspaper exercised its freedom of speech. Liberties are the holiest thing in the West, and nothing is more important. But if Islam were not the way it is, those cartoons would never have appeared. They did not appear out of the blue, and the cartoonist did not dig them out of his imagination. Rather, they are a reflection of his knowledge. Westerners who read the words of the Prophet Muhammad ‘Allah has given me sustenance under the shadow of my sword’ cannot imagine Muhammad’s turban in the shape of a dove of peace rather than in the shape of a bomb. The Muslims must learn how to listen to the criticism of others, and maybe then they will reexamine their terrorist teachings. When they manage to do so, the world will view them in a better light, and consequently, it will draw them in a better light. The reactions of the Muslims, which were characterized by savageness, barbarism, and backwardness, only increased the value of these cartoons, and gave them more importance than they merited, simply because they proved that these cartoons were true, and that the message they were conveying was true. The Muslim is an irrational creature ruled by instincts. Those teachings have deprived him of his mind, incited his emotions, and reduced him to the level of an inferior creature that cannot control himself or react to events rationally.”

[. . .]

“Why are they [“Palestinian” Muslims] upset about what is going on in Gaza, while the Koran says to them: ‘They shall kill and be killed.’ So here they are – killing and being killed. What’s wrong with that?”

“. . . you know that you cannot separate Islam from politics. Islam is not a religion, but politics. You must let me express my views the way I want. When you called me, you didn’t say I was not allowed to discuss Islam or the Koran. Islam says to them that they will ‘kill or be killed’, and here they are—killing and being killed. So what’s wrong with that? They want to be martyred and to meet their black-eyed virgins, and Israel is merely helping them get what they want. What’s wrong with that? If you want to change the course of events, you must reexamine your terrorist teachings, you must recognize and respect the right of the other to live, you must teach your children love, peace, coexistence, and productive work. When you do that, the world will respect you, will consider you in a better light, and will draw you in a better light.”

“. . . I can denounce the Palestinians and the Israelis alike. Hamas chose this path, and you have to pay the price for your choices. When you decide you want peace – I am sure that Israel wants peace, but as long as you keep reciting those teachings, which are full of hatred, rancor, and terrorism, you will be unable to make peace with others. You must recognize and respect Israel’s right to live. You must teach your children love, peace, and coexistence. Only then will there be peace.”

[. . .]

“Why do you want me to deny historical documents that confirm that the Holocaust took place? If there was no proof, I would deny it. But I cannot deny history, knowledge, and documents confirming that the Holocaust indeed took place. Why do you want me to deny the facts?”

[. . .]

“Can you as a Muslim deny the massacre of the Jews of the Bani Qureyza tribe, by Muhammad and his followers?”

[…]

“How can someone who believes in killing people who do not pray possibly criticize liberties in the West? This is a farce. What past is he [apologist for Allah] defending? Is he defending the invasions and lootings?”

“. . . polygamy, beheadings, chopping of heads and feet on alternate sides, accusing people of heresy, and drinking camel urine, as a cure for all ailments – is this the past he is defending?”

Would that our president spoke as plainly.

The West’s so-called leaders are self-seeking, ignorant cowards in service to Allah

In Appeasers and Useful Idiot Dhimmis, Defending jihad, FBI sensitive to Islam, Geert Wilders, Hamas, Liberals aid jihad, President Bush establishing Islam, The truth about Islam, Wafa Sultan on March 7, 2008 at 11:03 PM

President Bush pressures Israel to show “restraint” in punishing those responsible for killing their innocents.

Our media remain silent as the Religionists of Peace use their own children as shields against Israeli self-defense.

European politicians and media line up against Geert Wilders’s exposing the truth about Islam.

Our FBI extends the brainwashing of its agents for Allah.

The West’s so-called leaders are self-seeking, ignorant cowards. Doing what our political, media, and academic elites should be doing, here is Wafa Sultan on Al-Jazeera telling the truth about Islam:

“All religions and faiths, throughout the history of humanity, have been subject to criticism and affronts. With time, this has helped in their reform and development. Any belief that chops off the heads of its critics is doomed to turn into terrorism and tyranny. This has been the condition of Islam, from its inception to this day. Islam has sentenced [its critics] to prison, and whoever crosses the threshold of that prison meets his death. The Danish cartoons have managed to break down the first brick in the wall of that prison, and to open up a window, through which the sunrays enter, after a lengthy darkness. The Danish newspaper exercised its freedom of speech. Liberties are the holiest thing in the West, and nothing is more important. But if Islam were not the way it is, those cartoons would never have appeared. They did not appear out of the blue, and the cartoonist did not dig them out of his imagination. Rather, they are a reflection of his knowledge. Westerners who read the words of the Prophet Muhammad ‘Allah has given me sustenance under the shadow of my sword’ cannot imagine Muhammad’s turban in the shape of a dove of peace rather than in the shape of a bomb. The Muslims must learn how to listen to the criticism of others, and maybe then they will reexamine their terrorist teachings. When they manage to do so, the world will view them in a better light, and consequently, it will draw them in a better light. The reactions of the Muslims, which were characterized by savageness, barbarism, and backwardness, only increased the value of these cartoons, and gave them more importance than they merited, simply because they proved that these cartoons were true, and that the message they were conveying was true. The Muslim is an irrational creature ruled by instincts. Those teachings have deprived him of his mind, incited his emotions, and reduced him to the level of an inferior creature that cannot control himself or react to events rationally.”

[. . .]

“Why are they [“Palestinian” Muslims] upset about what is going on in Gaza, while the Koran says to them: ‘They shall kill and be killed.’ So here they are – killing and being killed. What’s wrong with that?”

“. . . you know that you cannot separate Islam from politics. Islam is not a religion, but politics. You must let me express my views the way I want. When you called me, you didn’t say I was not allowed to discuss Islam or the Koran. Islam says to them that they will ‘kill or be killed’, and here they are—killing and being killed. So what’s wrong with that? They want to be martyred and to meet their black-eyed virgins, and Israel is merely helping them get what they want. What’s wrong with that? If you want to change the course of events, you must reexamine your terrorist teachings, you must recognize and respect the right of the other to live, you must teach your children love, peace, coexistence, and productive work. When you do that, the world will respect you, will consider you in a better light, and will draw you in a better light.”

“. . . I can denounce the Palestinians and the Israelis alike. Hamas chose this path, and you have to pay the price for your choices. When you decide you want peace – I am sure that Israel wants peace, but as long as you keep reciting those teachings, which are full of hatred, rancor, and terrorism, you will be unable to make peace with others. You must recognize and respect Israel’s right to live. You must teach your children love, peace, and coexistence. Only then will there be peace.”

[. . .]

“Why do you want me to deny historical documents that confirm that the Holocaust took place? If there was no proof, I would deny it. But I cannot deny history, knowledge, and documents confirming that the Holocaust indeed took place. Why do you want me to deny the facts?”

[. . .]

“Can you as a Muslim deny the massacre of the Jews of the Bani Qureyza tribe, by Muhammad and his followers?”

[…]

“How can someone who believes in killing people who do not pray possibly criticize liberties in the West? This is a farce. What past is he [apologist for Allah] defending? Is he defending the invasions and lootings?”

“. . . polygamy, beheadings, chopping of heads and feet on alternate sides, accusing people of heresy, and drinking camel urine, as a cure for all ailments – is this the past he is defending?”

Would that our president spoke as plainly.

Geert Wilders and Ayaan Hirsi Ali warn the West against encroaching Islam

In Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Geert Wilders, Islamophobia, Resisting Jihad, Submission, The truth about Islam, Theo van Gogh on February 5, 2008 at 2:46 PM

What major political leaders in the West have the sense and courage to confront the bloodlust of Allah? Certainly not President Bush.

Here is Geert Wilders with a proper warning against encroaching jihad and what motivates it, in two parts.

Notice the interviewer’s suggestion for dealing with the unsurprising death threats coming from Muslims — sacrifice your freedom of speech:

And here’s the first part of Submission, the film written by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, for which Theo van Gogh was butchered by Allah (some images unsuitable for children):

Geert Wilders and Ayaan Hirsi Ali warn the West against encroaching Islam

In Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Geert Wilders, Islamophobia, Resisting Jihad, Submission, The truth about Islam, Theo van Gogh on February 5, 2008 at 2:46 PM

What major political leaders in the West have the sense and courage to confront the bloodlust of Allah? Certainly not President Bush.

Here is Geert Wilders with a proper warning against encroaching jihad and what motivates it, in two parts.

Notice the interviewer’s suggestion for dealing with the unsurprising death threats coming from Muslims — sacrifice your freedom of speech:

And here’s the first part of Submission, the film written by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, for which Theo van Gogh was butchered by Allah (some images unsuitable for children):